Graffix Renders Graffix Renders Forum Join FREE: Webmasters, Web Tools, Web Hosting Reviews, Coding, Graphics, Artists, Art, Information & News
July 29, 2010, 11:35:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: News for Webmasters, Coders, Web Hosts, Natural Artists, Graphic Artists, Computer Geeks, etc!
 
HOME Webmaster Tools Wallpapers Online Comics Hosting & Domains
   Forum   Blogs Help Search Links Gallery Login Register  

In: Miscellaneous
Viewed 47 times

In: Miscellaneous
Viewed 45 times

In: Miscellaneous
Viewed 45 times

In: Miscellaneous
Viewed 39 times

In: Miscellaneous
Viewed 34 times
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: JPG Compression  (Read 681 times)
 
Admin
Administrator
Trade Count: (0)
Sr. Member
****
Skill: Professional
Posts: 313



« on: January 06, 2008, 04:36:09 AM »
Reply with quoteQuote

jpg compression

Up to what ratio do you normally use to compress your JPGs before losing significant quality?
Logged

krakyn
Trade Count: (0)
Jr. Member
**
Skill: Learning!
Tech: Learning!
Posts: 53



« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2008, 03:56:12 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

I did not realize you lost quality on a picture when you compressed it then decompressed it.  Why does that happen?
Logged
Admin
Administrator
Trade Count: (0)
Sr. Member
****
Skill: Professional
Posts: 313



« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2008, 04:09:49 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

Basically the image appears more blurred or distorted the more you compress it. Compression is for faster loading pages.
Logged

krakyn
Trade Count: (0)
Jr. Member
**
Skill: Learning!
Tech: Learning!
Posts: 53



« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2008, 04:34:09 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

That makes sense I was thinking more like a winzip then send the file to some one and that it was corrupted in the process.  Thank you for that clarification.
Logged
Admin
Administrator
Trade Count: (0)
Sr. Member
****
Skill: Professional
Posts: 313



« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2008, 07:09:47 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

Oh well if you are sending a file for later reproduction then it is best to send it uncompressed. If you are creating it for the web then you definitely have to compress it or people can be waiting a very long time to see your images, especially if they are in a remote area that only has dialup.
Logged

krakyn
Trade Count: (0)
Jr. Member
**
Skill: Learning!
Tech: Learning!
Posts: 53



« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2008, 04:11:51 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

Thanks for the tip I will keep that in mind.  Lately I have been burning dvds and mailing them to my family. 
Logged
Admin
Administrator
Trade Count: (0)
Sr. Member
****
Skill: Professional
Posts: 313



« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2008, 12:10:20 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

You can use rar compression to keep images together in a smaller state without actually affecting the image itself if you are looking to distribute.
Logged

krakyn
Trade Count: (0)
Jr. Member
**
Skill: Learning!
Tech: Learning!
Posts: 53



« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2008, 07:29:54 PM »
Reply with quoteQuote

I will have to try that as memory is everything.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  


GraffixRenders.com Managed by: BGID® | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | Disclaimer | International Discussion | Contact
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Powered by Blog Community 2.0.2 Beta  |  © 2008 Charles Hill
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Google visited last this page July 11, 2010, 03:58:24 PM